Digitalization and alternative marketing channels in the Uruguayan fruit and vegetable chain
Perspectives from main actors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.28.1476Keywords:
digitalization, family farming, marketing channels, participatory actionAbstract
This study aims to delve into the potentials and difficulties of digitalization on the real commercial experience of some of the fundamental actors in the Uruguayan fruit and vegetable chain (producers, merchants, intermediaries, consumers, and private and public technicians). For that, these social actors and their projects were described and consulted in search of appreciations or points of view regarding technical innovations, barriers to commercialization, family labor, public policies, pressure for land use, and other complex problems. Through a “snowball sampling”, carrying out semi-structured questionnaires for more than 4 months from INIA Las Brujas, we obtained information mainly from actors in the south and some points in the northwest and east-central Uruguay. Opinions come from the complexity of people in their different roles, with the expected emergence of tensions and contradictions at different moments of the participatory-action research. We could appreciate that the Fourth and Fifth Industrial Revolution are having a significant impact in the Uruguayan fruit and vegetable chain. Digital technology is providing new tools for marketing such as: electronic commerce platforms, mobile applications, traceability and monitoring technologies for data analysis, etc. Support in this transformation comes both from private initiatives and public projects, some of which are outlined. We discuss some causes of digitalization disparities and some solutions, debating the role of each one of the represented actors and their possibilities of change.
Downloads
References
Ackermann MN, Díaz A. Horticultura: situación y perspectivas. In: Anuario OPYPA [nternet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2016 [cited 2024 Jul 16]. p. 229-46. Available from: https://bit.ly/3168oHZ
Agrotic: Soluciones digitales para la producción familiar [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/4eS2MCd
Ane T, Yasmin S. Agriculture in the fourth industrial revolution. Annals of Bangladesh Agriculture. 2019;23(2):115-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/aba.v23i2.50060
Arocena F. Cultura y Desarrollo en el Uruguay del Siglo XXI. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 2017;30(41): 9-13.
Atkinson R, Flint J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Soc res update. 2001;33(1):1-4.
Becerra LY. Tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en la era de la cuarta revolución industrial: tendencias tecnológicas y desafíos en la educación en ingeniería. Entre Cienc Ing. 2020;14(28):76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31908/19098367.2057
Bellacomo C, Berriolo MJ, Caracotche MV, Castagnino AM, Cendón ML, Díaz KE, Fasciglione G, Ferrín G, Mairosser A, Martinoia GI, Rogers WJ. Panorama of intensive plant production of healthy foods-"Proalim Km 0", in times of pandemic by Covid-19-Part 2: preferences of the production, agribusiness, commercialization and consumption of diversity of vegetables. Hortic Argent. 2020;39(100):357-97.
Bloem J, Van Doorn M, Duivestein S, Excoffier D, Maas R, Van Ommeren E. The fourth industrial revolution: things to tighten the link between IT and OT. Groningen: Sogeti VINT; 2014. 39p. Report No.: 3.
Callaghan CW. Transcending the threshold limitation: a fifth industrial revolution? Manag Res Rev. 2019;43(4):447-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2019-0102
Cendón ML, Molpeceres MC, Zulaica ML, Rouvier M. Agroecología y canales cortos en el contexto del COVID-19: el caso de la horticultura marplatense. Cuyonomics. 2021;5(8):90-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.42.036
Censo Nacional 2023 será obligatorio e implicará trabajo de campo de 10.500 personas [Internet]. Montevideo: Uruguay Presidencia; 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3Wgffs4
Central Hortícola del Norte será un centro de desarrollo, difusión y capacitación [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2021 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/noticias/central-horticola-del-norte-sera-centro-desarrollo-difusion-capacitacion
Checkland P. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2000;17(1):11-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO;2-O
Colmenares AM. Investigación-acción participativa: una metodología integradora del conocimiento y la acción. Voces Silec Rev Latinoam Educ. 2012;3(1):102-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18175/vys3.1.2012.07
Compras públicas para el desarrollo: el aporte del Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. In: V Jornadas Técnicas de Compras y Contrataciones Estatales [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3W2aW24
Controladores biológicos: horticultores trabajan en producción con valor agregado [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2019 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/noticias/controladores-biologicos-horticultores-trabajan-produccion-valor-agregado
Cooperativas agrarias como generadoras de desarrollo local [Internet]. Montevideo: INACOOP; 2023 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.inacoop.org.uy/single-post/cooperativas-agrarias-como-generadoras-de-d-de-e-desarrollo-local
Desarrollo local basado en la producción, agregado de valor y comercialización de alimentos a escala familiar con enfoque agroecológico [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/4bK8zqp
Fals Borda O. Orígenes universales y retos actuales de la IAP. Anal político. 1999;38:73-90.
FAO. REAF Mercosur: una década de coproducción de políticas públicas entre el estado y la sociedad civil. Porto Alegre: FAO; 2016. 30p.
Floridi L. Identity: onlife. In: The fourth revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 59-87
Gallardo-Cobos R, Sánchez-Zamora P. Retos y oportunidades de la digitalización en el medio rural. Mediterráneo económico. 2022;35:401-16.
Hassoun A, Aït-Kaddour A, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Rathod NB, Bader F, Barba FJ, Biancolillo A, Cropotova J, Galanakis CM, Jambrak AR, Lorenzo JM, Måge I, Ozogul F, Regenstein J. The fourth industrial revolution in the food industry-Part I: Industry 4.0 technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(23):6547-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2034735
Hassoun A, Kamiloglu S, Garcia-Garcia G, Parra-López C, Trollman H, Jagtap S, Aadil RM, Esatbeyoglu T. Implementation of relevant fourth industrial revolution innovations across the supply chain of fruits and vegetables: a short update on Traceability 4.0. Food Chem. 2023;409:135303. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135303
Investigación de hábitos y comportamiento de consumo de alimentos en Uruguay. [Place unknown]: Impulsa Alimentos; 2020. 132p.
Jiménez JC, Sánchez JG, Aguilar FG. Guía técnica para la construcción de cuestionarios. Odiseo [Internet]. 2006 [2024 Jul 10];3(6). Available from: https://odiseo.com.mx/2006/01/casas_garcia_gonzalez-guia.html
La Ecotienda, un local cien por ciento natural. Especator.com [Internet] 2006 Apr 26 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: http://historico.espectador.com/sociedad/67366/la-ecotienda-un-local-cien-por-ciento-natural
Latorre A. La investigación acción y el cambio organizacional. In: Joaquín G, Carme A, editors. Estrategias de formación para el cambio organizacional. Barcelona: EDO; 2003. p. 389-403.
Marques Berrutti M, Pizzolon A, Álvarez JA. A soft systems approach for innovation in the fruits and vegetables market in Uruguay. Sustainability in Debate. 2023;14(1):230-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.47425
Más tecnologías para la producción familiar [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2014 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3S1DYxE
Memoria y tradiciones: dieciseis proyectos seleccionados [Internet]. Montevideo: Fondo concursable para la cultura; 2014 [cited 2023 Mar 22]. Available from: https://bit.ly/4d02ozP
Mercado Agrícola Familiar (MAF), Melo - Cerro Largo [Internet]. Montevideo: OPP; 2019 [cited 2024 Jul 11]; Available from: https://www.opp.gub.uy/es/videos/mercado-agricola-familiar-maf-melo-cerro-largo
Midgley G. Systems Thinking for the 21st Century. In: Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Boston: Springer; 2000. p. 249-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4201-8_1
Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, DIEA (UY). Censo General Agropecuario 2011 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2011 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3Fw8OpU
Mourtzis D. Towards the 5th industrial revolution: a literature review and a framework for process optimization based on big data analytics and semantics. J Mach Eng. 2021;21(3):5-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/141834
MPS. ¿Cómo surge el Mercado Popular de Subsitencia? [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://mps.org.uy/como-surge-el-mercado-popular-de-subsitencia/
Nagel J. Principales barreras para la adopción de las TIC en la agricultura y en las áreas rurales [Internet]. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL; 2012 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. 54p. Available from: https://bit.ly/3zDuuSX
O'Brien KL, Leichenko RM. Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environ Change. 2000;10(3):221-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2
Observatorio Granjero. Anuario Estadístico 2021. Montevideo: MGAP; 2021. 61p.
Paolino C, Rodríguez A, López L, Errea E, Paolino L, Berretta N, Oddone G. Evaluación del Programa de Reconversión y Fomento de la Granja (PREDEG) [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Availabe from: https://bit.ly/4bDAgBi
Philbeck T, Davis N. The fourth industrial revolution. J Int Aff. 2018;72(1):17-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400655357.ch-001
Productores familiares proyectan ampliar sus ventas, incluyendo al Estado como comprador, amparados en la Ley 19.292 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2017 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/4eX2QAA
Rossi V, Notaro J. La Comisión Nacional de Fomento Rural y su resistencia como sujeto colectivo «alternativo» en el agro uruguayo (1999-2014). Pampa. 2016;14:59-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14409/pampa.v0i14.6112
Rossing WA, Albicette MM, Aguerre V, Leoni C, Ruggia A, Dogliotti S. Crafting actionable knowledge on ecological intensification: lessons from co-innovation approaches in Uruguay and Europe. Agric Syst. 2021;190:2-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103103
Samper M, Sabourin E, Le Coq JF. Principales implicaciones para las políticas públicas. In: Sabourin E, Samper M, Sotomayor O, editors. Políticas públicas y agriculturas familiares en América Latina y el Caribe: nuevas perspectivas. San José: IICA; 2014. p. 352-63.
Senda Agroecológica 2da edición [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2019 [cited 2024 Jul 11]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3S4S15L
Viteri ML, Abdala JC, Vittar MC, Quinteros GN. Distribución local de alimentos en tiempos de pandemia. Hortic Argent. 2021;40(101):59-71.

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Agrociencia Uruguay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article metrics | |
---|---|
Abstract views | |
Galley vies | |
PDF Views | |
HTML views | |
Other views |