Fruit descriptors for Feijoa sellowiana

Basis for selection and breeding

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.29.1569

Keywords:

genetic variability, germplasm collection, feijoa, native fruit, phenotypic selection

Abstract

The introduction and evaluation garden of native fruit tree species, located at INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay, is the result of extensive efforts of prospecting and introducing germplasm for over 20 years. The garden comprised wild, native accessions from Uruguay, foreign cultivars as well as progenies derived from planned hybridizations. This study presents the phenotypic characterization of 329 feijoa genotypes that are part of this collection, based on 24 fruit descriptors (12 qualitative and 12 quantitative traits), evaluated over two growing seasons (2021-2022 and 2022-2023). The most frequently observed characteristics included trees of medium to low fruit load (up to 10 kg per plant), medium-sized fruits (30-50 g), flavor ranging from moderate to good, light green color, slightly rough skin texture, ellipsoid fruit shape, semi-open sepal position, rounded apex and base, translucent flesh, clearly defined locules, and undetectable flesh browning from one-minute assays. The wide distribution of states of expression for each trait, or the dispersion of values for the quantitative traits evaluated, indicated that the feijoa collection exhibited high variability in fruit-related traits, serving as essential raw material for improving fruit quality in feijoa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bini L, Gori M, Novello MA, Biricolti S, Giordani E, Lara MV, Niella F, Nunziata A, Rocha P, Filippi JM, Natale R. Assessing the genetic diversity of wild and commercial Feijoa sellowiana accessions using AFLPs. Horticulturae. 2024;10(4):366. Doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10040366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040366

Borsuk LJ, Saifert L, Otalora Vollamil JM, Sánchez Moura FD, Nodari RO. Phenotypic variability in feijoa fruits [Acca sellowiana (O. Berg.) Burret] on indigenous lands, quilombolas communities and protected areas in the south of Brazil. Rev Bras Frutic. 2017;39(1). Doi: 10.1590/0100-29452017699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017699

Brussa C, Grela I. Flora Arbórea del Uruguay: con énfasis en las especies de Rivera y Tacuarembó. Rivera: CONFUSA; 2007. 544p.

Cabrera D, Vignale B, Machado G, Rodríguez P, Zoppolo R, Nebel JP. Primeras selecciones registradas de guayabo del país en Uruguay. Rev INIA. 2018;52:29-32.

Cabrera D, Vignale B, Rodríguez P, Luizzi D, Dini M. INIA FAGRO ARMONÍA: nuevo cultivar de guayabo del país para Uruguay. Rev INIA. 2023;(75):71-6.

Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P. Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2003;(28):159-67. Doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00173-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00173-4

Cruz C, Escanda F, Machado J, Rameau C. Caracterización de una población de Guayabo del país (Acca sellowiana Berg. Burret) de pulpa rosada. In: 6º Encuentro Nacional sobre Frutos Nativos. Canelones: INIA; 2012. p. 45-7.

Gaona-García A, Alia-Tejacal I, López-Martínez V, Andrade-Rodríguez M, Colinas-León MT, Villegas-Torres O. Characterization of sapote mamey fruits (Pouteria sapota), in the southwest region of morelos. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic. 2008;14(1):41-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2006.02.013

García-Rivera LM, Váquiro-Herrera HA, Solanilla-Duque JF. Caracterización fisicoquímica y análisis de la composición nutricional de la feijoa en tres diferentes estadios de madurez. Agron Colomb. 2016;34(2):217-27. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56030

González-García KE, Guerra-Ramírez D, Del Ángel-Coronel OA, Cruz-Castillo JG. Atributos físicos y químicos del fruto de feijoa en Veracruz, México. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic. 2018;24(1):5-12. Doi: 10.5154/r.rchsh.2017.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2017.01.006

Harman JE. Feijoa fruit: growth and chemical composition during development. N Z J Exp Agr. 1987;15(2):209-15. Doi: 10.1080/03015521.1987.10425561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1987.10425561

Höfer M, Giovannini D. Phenotypic characterization and evaluation of European cherry collections: a survey to determine the most commonly used descriptors. Scientific Pages Hortic. 2017;1(1):7-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36959/745/392

Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Banco de Datos Agroclimáticos [Internet]. Montevideo: INIA; [cited 2025 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.inia.uy/gras/Clima/Banco-datos-agroclimatico

Li LF, Olsen KM. To have and to hold: selection for seed and fruit retention during crop domestication. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;119:63-109. Doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.02.002

Lucas EJ, Holst B, Sobral M, Mazine FF, Nic Lughadha EM, Proença CEB, da Costa IR, Vasconcelos TNC. A new subtribal classification of Tribe Myrteae (Myrtaceae). Syst Bot. 2019;44(3):560-9. Doi: 10.1600/036364419X15620113920608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364419X15620113920608

Medina EL, Zavaleta AL, Rivero AEG, León JM, de la Cruz Castillo AJ, Zapata LV. Fruit and seed morphometry of “ají mochero” capsicum chinense Jacq. Cienc Tecnol Agropecuaria Méx. 2020;21(3):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol21_num3_art:1598

Mendes EM, Alves de Gois V, de Lima RH, Aroucha MC, Sobreira M. Acidez em frutas e hortaliças. Rev Verde Agroecologia Desenvolv Sustent. 2010;5(2):1-4.

Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária e Abastecimento, Serviço Nacional de Proteção de Cultivares (BR). Instruções para execução dos ensaios de distinguibilidade, homogeneidade e estabilidade de cultivares de goiabeira serrana (Acca sellowiana) [Internet]. Brasília: MAPA; 2017 [cited 2025 Aug 14]. 9p. Available from: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/insumos-agricolas/protecao-de-cultivar/arquivos-frutiferas/goiabeira-serrana-formul-c1rio-290ut2008-p.doc

Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, DGSA (UY). Norma para la producción integrada de manzano: actualización 2020 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2021 [cited 2025 Aug 14]. 40p. Available from: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/publicaciones/norma-para-produccion-integrada-manzano-actualizacion-2020

Observatorio Granjero. Anuario estadístico UAM [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 14]. Available from: https://uam.com.uy/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Anuario_UAM-_2022.pdf

Observatorio Granjero. Anuario estadístico UAM [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 14]. Available from: https://uam.com.uy/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Anuario-UAM-2024-Observatorio-Granjero.pdf

Parker IM, López I, Petersen JJ, Anaya N, Cubilla-Rios L, Potter D. Domestication syndrome in Caimito (Chrysophyllum cainito L.): fruit and seed characteristics. Econ Bot. 2010;64(2):161-75. Doi: 10.1007/s12231-010-9121-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-010-9121-4

Parra-Coronado A, Fischer G, Chaves-Cordoba B. Thermal time for reproductive phenological stages of Pineapple Guava (Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret). Acta Biolo Colomb. 2015;20(1):153-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v20n1.43390

Pasquariello MS, Mastrobuoni F, Di Patre D, Zampella L, Capuano LR, Scortichini M, Petriccione M. Agronomic, nutraceutical and molecular variability of feijoa (Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret) germplasm. Sci Hortic. 2015;191:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.036

Patterson KJ. Effects of hand pollination on fruit set and fruit quality of the feijoa (Acca sellowiana). Acta Hortic. 1989;(240):197-200. Doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.240.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.240.36

Puppo M, Rivas M, Franco J, Barbieri RL. Proposal of descriptors for Acca sellowiana (Berg.) Burret. Rev Bras Frutic. 2014;36(4):957-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-2945-393/13

Puppo Mackinnon M. Prospección y caracterización de poblaciones silvestres de Acca sellowiana (Berg) Burret. (Guayabo del País) [bachelor's thesis]. Montevideo (UY): Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía; 2008. 141p.

Rivas M, Puppo M, Baccino E, Quezada M, Franco J, Pritsch C. Phenotypic and molecular diversity of wild populations of Acca sellowiana (Berg.) burret in the southern area of natural distribution. Horticulturae. 2024;10(4):360. Doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10040360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040360

Rodríguez SDC, Generoso SM, Gutierrez DR, Questa AG. Application of sensory analysis in the evaluation of quality fresh-cut vegetables. Simiente. 2015;85:21-38.

Sánchez-Mora FD, Saifert L, Ciotta MN, Ribeiro HN, Petry VS, Rojas-Molina AM, Lopes ME, Lombardi GG, dos Santos KL, Ducroquet JPHJ, Nodari RO. Characterization of phenotypic diversity of feijoa fruits of germplasm accessions in Brazil. Agrosyst Geosci Environ. 2019;2(1):1-11. Doi: 10.2134/age2019.01.0005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.01.0005

UPOV. Feijoa: Acca sellowiana (Berg) Burret [Internet]. Ginebra: UPOV; 2015 [cited 2025 Aug 14]. 31p. Available from: https://www.upov.int/edocs/mdocs/upov/es/tc_51/tg_acca_proj_5.pdf

Vignale B, Cabrera D, Rodríguez P, Machado G. Selección de frutales nativos en Uruguay. Hortic Argent. 2016;35:19-29.

Wang S, Lin T, Man G, Li H, Zhao L, Wu J, Liao X. Effects of anti-browning combinations of ascorbic acid, citric acid, nitrogen and carbon dioxide on the quality of banana smoothies. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013;7(1):161-73. Doi: 10.1007/s11947-013-1107-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1107-7

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

1.
López L, Rodríguez P, Cabrera D, Pritsch C, Dini M. Fruit descriptors for Feijoa sellowiana: Basis for selection and breeding. Agrocienc Urug [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 15 [cited 2025 Oct. 18];29(NE3):e1569. Available from: https://agrocienciauruguay.uy/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/1569

Issue

Section

Article
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>