Dynamic conservation of maize landraces by family farmers in Minas Gerais, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.26.959Keywords:
agrobiodiversity, on farm conservation, traditional knowledge, Zea mays L.Abstract
Seed replacement promoted by agricultural modernization generated predictions of the disappearance of landraces. Family farmers, however, still keep their seeds contributing to on farm conservation. This study analyzes the structure and dynamics of a local seed system and the reasons that lead farmers to maintain their maize landraces even in the presence of commercial varieties. Twenty farmers in the Zona da Mata of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were interviewed based on indications made by local leaders. The results show that farmers actively maintain diversified channels of access to seeds for planting and new varieties, with an emphasis on family and community relationships. Participation in events expands access to new varieties. Maize landraces have food and agronomic qualities that justify their maintenance. It is concluded that landraces generate autonomy and are at the same time the result of farmers' autonomy in relation to local genetic resources, and their conservation depends on their free access to agrobiodiversity as well as their constant selection to adapt to their productive systems and uses.
Downloads
References
Agapito-Tenfen S, Lopez FR, Mallah N, Abou-Slemayne G, Trtikova M, Nodari RO, Wickson F. Transgene flow in Mexican maize revisited: Socio-biological analysis across two contrasting farmer communities and seed management systems. Ecol Evol. 2017;7(22):9461-72.
Altieri MA, Merrick L. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Econ Bot. 1987;41(1):86-96.
Bellon MR. Conceptualizing Interventions to Support On-Farm Genetic Resource Conservation. World Development. 2004;32(1):159-72.
Bellon MR. The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmer level. Econ Bot. 1996;50(1):26-39.
Bellon MR. The ethnoecology of maize variety management: a case study from Mexico. Hum Ecol. 1991;19(3):389-418.
Bellon MR, Brush SB. Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Econ Bot. 1994;48(2):196-209.
Bevilaqua GA, Antunes IF, Babieri RL, Schwengber JE, Silva SDA, Leite DL, Cardoso JH. Agricultores guardiões de sementes e ampliação da agrobiodiversidade. Cad Ciênc Tecnol. 2014;31(1):99-118.
Brush SB. A Farmer-based approach to conserving crop germplasm. Econ Bot. 1991;45(2):153-65.
Brush SB. The issues of in situ conservation of crop genetic resources. In: Brush SB, editor. Genes in the field: on-farm conservation of crop diversity. Rome: IPGR; 2000. p. 3-26.
Brush SB, Corrales MB, Schmidt E. Agricultural development and maize diversity in Mexico. Hum Ecol. 1988;16(3):307-28.
Capellesso AJ, Cazella AA, Schmitt Filho AL, Farley J, Martins DA. Economic and environmental impacts of production intensification in agriculture: comparing transgenic, conventional, and agroecological maize crops. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst. 2016;40(3):215-36.
Cleveland DA, Soleri D, Smith SE. Do Folk Crop Varieties Have a Role in Sustainable Agriculture? BioScience. 1994;44(11):740-51.
Coomes OT, McGuire SJ, Garine E, Caillon S, McKey D, Demeulenaere E, Jarvis D, Aistara G, Barnaud A, Clouvel P, Emperaire L, Louafi S, Martin P, Massol F, Pautasso M, Violon C, Wencélius J. Farmer seed networks make a limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions. Food Policy. 2015;56:41-50.
Costa FM, Silva NC de A, Ogliari JB. Maize diversity in southern Brazil: indication of a microcenter of Zea mays L. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2017;64(4):681-700.
dos Santos AS, Oliveira LCL, Curado FF, Tavares ED, Dalmora E. Variedades Crioulas de Milho para a Realidade da Agricultura Familiar no Semiárido Sergipano [Internet]. Aracaju: Embrapa; 2016 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. 8p. (Comunicado Técnico; 190). Available from: https://bit.ly/32QW7rm.
dos Santos AS, Silva ED, Tavares ED, Curado FF, Sales JFS, Pereira L. Desempenho de Variedades Crioulas e Comerciais de Feijão-Macassar ou FeijãoCaupi no Agreste Paraibano [Internet]. Aracaju: Embrapa; 2016 [cited 2021 Dec 12]. 8p. (Comunicado Técnico; 186). Available from: https://bit.ly/3xd4CKe.
FAO. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2019 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. 576p. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf.
Ferment G, Melgarejo L, Fernandes GB, Ferraz JMG. Transgenic Crops – hazards and uncertainties: more than 750 studies disregarded by the GMOs regulatory bodies [Internet]. 1st ed. Brasília: Nead; 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. 226p. (Nead Debate). Available from: https://bit.ly/36U4ox3.
Fernandes GB, Silva ED da. Semillas da paixão: una experiencia colectiva y territorial de conservación de la agrobiodiversidad en Agreste de Paraíba. In: Maíces de las Tierras Bajas de América del Sur y Conservación de la Agrobiodiversidad en Brasil y Uruguay [Internet]. Ponta Grossa: Atena; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. p. 181-97. Available from: https://www.atenaeditora.com.br/post-ebook/3743
Fernandes GB. Pesquisa em Agroecologia: reflexões a partir do estudo de sistemas locais de conservação e uso de sementes crioulas [Internet] [doctoral’s thesis on Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Unversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. 256p. Available from: https://bit.ly/3Eej05S.
Fernandes GB. Sementes crioulas, varietais e orgânicas para a agricultura familiar: da exceção legal à política pública. In: Sambuichi RHR, Moura IF, Mattos LM, Ávila ML, Silva APM, editors. A política nacional de agroecologia e produção orgânica no Brasil: uma trajetória de luta pelo desenvolvimento rural sustentável [Internet]. Brasília: Ipea; 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. p. 327-57. Available from: http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/8814.
Fiore MC, Raimondo FM, Mercati F, Digangi I, Sunseri F, Scialabba A. Preserving Biodiversity in Marginal Rural Areas: Assessment of Morphological and Genetic Variability of a Sicilian Common Bean Germplasm Collection. Plants [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 16];9(8):989. doi:10.3390/plants9080989.
Gliessman SR. Recursos genéticos em agroecossistemas. In: Agroecologia: processos ecológicos em agricultura sustentável. Porto Alegre: UFRGS; 2009. p. 373-409.
Heinemann JA. A typology of the effects of (trans)gene flow on the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2007 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. 94p. (Background study paper; 35). Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/k0153e/k0153e.pdf
Hilbeck A, Binimelis R, Defarge N, Steinbrecher R, Székács A, Wickson F, Michael Antoniou M, Bereano PL, Clark EA, Hansen M, Novotny E, Heinemann J, Meyer H, Shiva V, Wynne B. No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environ Sci Eur [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Dec 16];27(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1.
Jarvis DI, Brown AH, Cuong PH, Collado-Panduro L, Latournerie-Moreno L, Gyawali S, Tanto T, Sawadogo M, Mar I, Sadiki M, Hue NT, Arias-Reyes L, Balma D, Bajracharya J, Castillo F, Rijal D, Belqadi L, Rana R, Saidi S, Ouedraogo J, Zangre R, Rhrib K, Chavez JL, Schoen D, Sthapit B, De Santis P, Fadda C, Hodgkin T. A global perspective of the richness and evenness of traditional crop-variety diversity maintained by farming communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(14):5326-31.
Jarvis DI, Hodgkin T, Sthapit BR, Fadda C, Lopez-Noriega I. An Heuristic Framework for Identifying Multiple Ways of Supporting the Conservation and Use of Traditional Crop Varieties within the Agricultural Production System. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2011;30(1-2):125-76.
Kistler L, Maezumi SY, Gregorio de Souza J, Przelomska NAS, Malaquias Costa F, Smith O, Loiselle H, Ramos-Madrigal J, Wales N, Ribeiro ER, Morrison RR, Grimaldo C, Prous AP, Arriaza B, Gilbert MTP, de Oliveira Freitas F, Allaby RG. Multiproxy evidence highlights a complex evolutionary legacy of maize in South America. Science. 2018;362(6420):1309-13.
Lacey H. As sementes e o conhecimento que elas incorporam. São Paulo Perspec. 2000;14(3):53-9.
Louette D. Traditional management of seed and genetic diversity: what is a landrace? In: Brush SB, editor. Genes in the field: on-farm conservation of crop diversity. Rome: IPGR; 2000. p. 109-42.
Louette D, Charrier A, Berthaud J. In Situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and Maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ Bot. 1997;51(1):20-38.
Louette D, Smale M. Farmers’ seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica. 2000;113(1):25-41.
McAfee K. Corn Culture and Dangerous DNA: Real and Imagined Consequences of Maize Transgene Flow in Oaxaca. J Lat Am Geogr. 2003;2(1):18-42.
Montenegro de Wit M. Are we losing diversity? Navigating ecological, political, and epistemic dimensions of agrobiodiversity conservation. Agric Hum Values. 2016;33(3):625-40.
Mulvany P. Agricultural biodiversity is sustained in the framework of food sovereignty. Biodiversity. 2017;18(2-3):84-91.
Perales H, Brush SB, Qualset CO. Dynamic Management of Maize Landraces in Central Mexico. Economic Botany. 2003;57(1):21-34.
Pressoir G, Berthaud J. Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity. 2004;92(2):88-94.
Rótolo GC, Francis C, Craviotto RM, Ulgiati S. Environmental assessment of maize production alternatives: traditional, intensive and GMO-based cropping patterns. Ecol Indic. 2015;57:48-60.
Silva NC de A, Costa FM, Vidal R, Veasey EA. El proyecto de razas de maíz en las tierras bajas de América del Sur: ampliando el conocimiento sobre la diversidad de variedades criollas de Brasil y Uruguay. In: Maíces de las Tierras Bajas de América del Sur y Conservación de la Agrobiodiversidad en Brasil y Uruguay [Internet]. Ponta Grossa: Atena; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. p. 57-86. Available from: https://www.atenaeditora.com.br/post-ebook/3743
Silva NC de A, Fernandes GB, Elteto YM, Costa FM, Pereira LS, Vidal R. Quanto mais circulam mais são conservadas: nomes locais e redes de origem de sementes como componentes do manejo da diversidade de milho da Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais, Brasil. In: VII Congreso Latinoamericano de Agroecología. 1a ed. Guayaquil: Socla; 2019. p. 2064-70.
Silva NC de A, Vidal R, Costa FM, Veasey EA. Clasificación de las razas de maíz de Brasil y Uruguay: enfoque metodológico y principales resultados. In: Maíces de las Tierras Bajas de América del Sur y Conservación de la Agrobiodiversidad en Brasil y Uruguay [Internet]. Ponta Grossa: Atena; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. p. 87-109. Available from: https://www.atenaeditora.com.br/post-ebook/3743
Soleri D, Cleveland DA. Farmers’ genetic perceptions regarding their crop populations: an example with maize in the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2001;55(1):106-28.
Subedi A, Chaudhary P, Baniya BK, Rana RB, Tiwari RK, Rijal DK, Sthapit BR, Jarvis DI. Who Maintains Crop Genetic Diversity and How? Implications for On-farm Conservation and Utilization. Culture and Agriculture. 2003;25(2):41-50.
Teixeira FF, Souza BO de, Andrade RV de, Padilha L. Boas Práticas na Manutenção de Germoplasma e Variedades Crioulas de Milho [Internet]. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa; 2005 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. 8p. (Comunicado Técnico; 113). Available from: https://bit.ly/3LE2Nu6.
United Nations, General Assembly. The right to food: seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation [Internet]. New York: UN; 2009 [cited 2021 Dec 16] 22p. Report No.: A/64/170. Available from: https://bit.ly/3LCXOtw.
Vandermeer J, Perfecto I. Complex Traditions: Intersecting Theoretical Frameworks in Agroecological Research. J Sustain Agric Sci. 2013;37(1):76-89.
Zeven AC. Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica. 1998;104(2):127-39.
Zeven AC. The traditional inexplicable replacement of seed and seed ware of landraces and cultivars: a review. Euphytica. 1999;110(3):181-91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
