Vicente Guerrero Group experience
Promoting local processes for agroecological scaling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.29.1618Keywords:
agroecological transition, agroecological practices, peasant to peasant, family farmingAbstract
In Mexico, family farming accounts for 85% of production units, 80% of agricultural land and 54% of food production, a group that is important for food security and sovereignty. Peasant social movements, such as the Vicente Guerrero Group (GVG), an emblematic peasant organization in Mexico, see family farming as a key pillar for advancing collective and productive processes with agroecological basis and achieving food sovereignty. This study aimed to identify, recognize, and highlight the role of GVG as a partner and supporter of local processes through the peasant-to-peasant methodology. The research was conducted with 34 families from three communities linked to the GVG using a mixed approach that combined qualitative methods (participant observation, semi-structured interviews, workshops) and quantitative methods (survey). At least 27 actions and agroecological practices were identified; strategies that seek the responsible use and management of agrobiodiversity, soil, and water, along with actions for exchanging healthy agroecological products. The methodological strategy of agroecological intervention by the GVG with families is pro-moted through three strategic pillars: 1) dialogues or exchange of knowledge, 2) visits to the production spaces of the linked families, and 3) trial and/or replication of agroecological innovations in family plots. Foundations that made it possible to understand the dynamics of linking and consolidating the collective processes of the GVG, in addition to being positioned as a repository of efforts, struggles, and the dissemination of improved peasant practices for more than 40 years on a territorial scale.
Downloads
References
Castañeda-Zavala Y, Massieu-Trigo Y, Talavera-Martínez I. El Grupo Vicente Guerrero: la lucha por el trabajo compartido. La Jornada del campo [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Sep 8];(125). Available from: https://www.jornada.com.mx/2018/02/17/cam-trabajo.html
Chávez-García E. Recuperación de saberes campesinos y apropiación de ecotecnologías en comunidades rurales de la Chontalpa, Tabasco, México. In: Memorias del V Congreso Latinoamericano de Agroecología [Internet]. [place unknown: publisher unknown]; 2015 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/54985
Diagnóstico del sector rural y pesquero: identificación de la problemática del sector agropecuario y pesquero de México 2012. Ciudad de México: SAGARPA; 2012. 68p.
FAO. Introducción al Decenio de las Naciones Unidas de la Agricultura Familiar [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2021 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/family-farming-decade/home/es/
FAO. Los 10 elementos de la agroecología: guía para la transición hacia sistemas alimentarios y agrícolas sostenibles [Internet]. Roma: FAO; 2018 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. 13p. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/i9037es/I9037ES.pdf
Flores-Sánchez D, López Mendoza M de la L, Pérez Olvera MA, Navarro Garza H, González Santiago MV. Tomate de cáscara (Physalis ixocarpa Brot. Ex Hornem.): prácticas sociotécnicas e indicadores agroecológicos en Vicente Guerrero, Tlaxcala. Rev Geograf Agríc. 2023;(70):87-102. Doi: 10.5154/r.rga.2022.70.05.
INEGI. Censo Agropecuario (CA) 2022 [Internet]. Mexico: INEGI; [cited 2025 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/cagf/2022
INEGI. Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria (ENA) 2019 [Internet]. México: INEGI; [cited 2025 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ena/2019/#Tabulados
López-García D, Calvet-Mir L, Espluga J, Di Masso Tarditti M. La dinamización local agroecológica como estrategia para la construcción de soberanías locales. Ecol Polít [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Sep 8];(49):28-34. Available from: https://www.ecologiapolitica.info/la-dinamizacion-local-agroecologica-como-estrategia-para-la-construccion-de-soberanias-locales/
López-García D, Cuéllar-Padilla M, de Azevedo Olival A, Laranjeira NP, Méndez VE, Peredo y Parada S, Barbosa CA, Barrera Salas C, Caswell M, Cohen R, Correro-Humanes A, García-García V, Gliessman SR, Pomar-León A, Sastre-Morató A, Tendero-Acín G. Building agroecology with people: challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts. J Rural Stud. 2021;83:257-67. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003.
Magda D, Girard N, Angeon V, Cholez C, Raulet-Croset N, Sabbadin R, Salliou N, Barnaud C, Monteil C, Peyrard N. A Plurality of view-points regarding the uncertainties of the agroecological transition. In: Bergez JE, Audouin E, Therond O, editors. Agroecological transitions: from theory to practice in local participatory design. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 99-120. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01953-2_6.
Mier M, Giménez-Cacho T, Felipe-Giraldo O, Aldasoro M, Morales H, Ferguson BG, Rosset P, Khadse A, Campos C. Escalamiento de la agroecología: impulsores clave y casos emblemáticos. Cuadernos de Trabajo [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Sep 8];(1). Available from: https://www.ecosur.mx/masificacion-agroecologia/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2019/06/Escalamiento-de-la-agroecología.pdf
Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación, DICORER (GT). Metodología campesino a campesino: su aplicación en el Sistema Nacional de Extensión Rural –SNER [Internet]. Guatemala: MAGA; 2013 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. 6p. Available from: https://www.maga.gob.gt/download/metodo-campesino.pdf
Navarrete CL. El enfoque agroecológico: una alternativa al modelo agroindustrial [bachelor's thesis on Internet]. Rosario (AR): Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; 2017 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. 71p. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2133/9474
Ocampo-Álvarez D. Metodología de campesino a campesino: actividades y herramientas ante el cambio climático [Internet]. La Habana: ANAP; 2016 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.ipscuba.net/media/2021/08/Metodologia-de-campesino-a-campesino.pdf
Ramírez-Juárez J. Seguridad alimentaria y la agricultura familiar en México. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc. 2022;13(3):553-65. Doi: 10.29312/remexca.v13i3.2854.
Rosset PM, Pinheiro-Barbosa L. Autonomía y los movimientos sociales del campo en América Latina: un debate urgente. Aposta Rev Cien Soci [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Sep 8];(89):8-31. Available from: http://apostadigital.com/revistav3/hemeroteca/prosset.pdf
Saavedra Montano D, Briones Valenzuela MA, Fiallos Oyanguren A. Programa campesino a campesino en Nicaragua: 30 años innovando con los campesinos, un modelo de extensión rural participativa. Managua: FUNICA; 2017. 39p.
Sarandón SJ. Biodiversidad, agroecología y agricultura sustentable [Internet]. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de la Plata; 2020 [cited 2025 Sep 8]. 429p. Available from: https://www.agroecologia.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/biodiversidad-agroecologia-santiago-sarandon.pdf
Vargas-Canales JM, García-Melchor N, Orozco-Cirilo Sergio, Camacho-Vera JH. Los siete pecados capitales del sector agroalimentario en México y cómo revertirlos. Agric Soc Desarro. 2023;20(4):516-32. Doi: 10.22231/asyd.v20i4.1578.
Vega Álvarez I. Erosión de diversidad de maíces nativos y pérdida de patrimonio biocultural en tres comunidades de Tlaxcala [doctoral dissertation]. Texcoco (MX): Colegio de Postgraduados; 2022. 207p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agrociencia Uruguay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley views | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |











