Performance assessment of furrow irrigation in two different soil textures under high rainfall and field slope conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.27.1187

Keywords:

furrow irrigation, application efficiency, irrigation evaluation, WinSRFR, water management

Abstract

Furrow irrigation systems have been widely evaluated around the world. However, there is no national data indicating how efficient furrow irrigation is under Uruguayan conditions. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the performance of a system of furrow irrigation in two different soils texture. Seventeen irrigation events were analyzed in sugar-cane cultivation in northern Uruguay during 2016-17 and 2017-18 irrigation seasons. The water advance and recess curves were determined; flow rate during irrigation and runoff were monitored. The maximum furrow length studied was 100 m and the average slope was 0.24%. Application efficiencies in both types of soils were observed above 75%. These field data were compared with data simulated by the WinSRFR model, where high correlations were observed in the results of water application efficiency, distribution uniformity and runoff. These first results encourage to continue working in the efficient use of water, not only thinking about a better use of the resource but also in less loss by run-off, and therefore, less possibility of contamination and lower cost of energy and labor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bautista E, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Schlegel J. Modern analysis of surface irrigation systems with WinSRFR. Agric Water Manag. 2009;96(7):1146-54. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.007.

Bautista E, Schlegel J, Strelkoff T. WinSRFR 4.1: user manual. Maricopa: USDA; 2012. 165p.

Carnelli JC. Riego en agroenergía predial. In: Potencial del riego extensivo en cultivos y pasturas. 1er Seminario Internacional; 2010 Aug; Paysandú, Uruguay. Montevideo: INIA; 2010. pp. 25-33.

Carroll C, Halpin M, Burger P, Bell K, Sallaway MM, Yule DF. The effect of crop type, croprotation, and tillage practice on runoff and soil loss on a Vertisol in central Quensland. Aust J Soil Res. 1997;35:925-39.

Dapueto Firpo V, Rodríguez Roig LA. Efecto de diferentes frecuencias de riego sobre el crecimiento y producción de tres variedades de caña de azúcar [grade’s thesis]. Montevideo (UY): Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía; 1986. 179p.

Day PR. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. Madison: ASA; 1965. pp. 545-67.

de la Peña Ruiz E, Martínez Correa M. Efecto de diferentes frecuencias de riego sobre el crecimiento y producción de tres variedades de caña de azúcar (2o año) [grade’s thesis]. Montevideo (UY): Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía; 1988. 222p.

De León L, Delgado S. Producción de aguas servidas, tratamiento y uso en Uruguay. In: Proyecto de desarrollo de capacidades para el uso seguro de aguas servidas en agricultura [Internet]. [place unknown: publisher unknown]; 2012 [cited 2023 Nov 07]. 15p. Available from: https://bit.ly/3MwTLSw

De Paco JL. Fundamentos del cálculo hidráulico en los sistemas de riego y drenaje. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa; 1992. 398p.

Durán A, Califra A, Molfino JH, Lynn W. Keys to soil taxonomy for Uruguay. Washington: USDA; 2006. 77p.

El riego en los países del Cono Sur. Montevideo: IICA; 2010. 112p.

FAO. FAOSTAT [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2019 [cited 2023 Nov 07]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QCL/visualize

FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2020: overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Rome: FAO; 2020. 178p. Doi: 10.4060/cb1447en.

González C, Cervera L, Moret-Fernández D. Basin irrigation design with longitudinal slope. Agric Water Manag. 2011;98(10):1516-22.

Hart WE, Collins HG, Woodward G, Humpherys AS. Design and operation of gravity or surface systems. In: Jensen ME, editor. Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. St. Joseph: ASAE; 1980. pp. 663-717.

Hudson NW. Medición sobre el terreno de la erosión del suelo y de la escorrentía. Rome: FAO; 1997. 147p.

Kostiakov AN. On the dynamics of the coefficient of water-percolation in soils and on the necessity for studying it from a dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration. In: Transactions of the Sixth Commission of the International Society of Soil Science. Groningen: International Society of Soil Science; 1932. pp. 17-21.

Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, DIEA (UY). Anuario estadístico agropecuario 2016 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2016 [cited 2023 Nov 07]. 198p. Available from: https://bit.ly/2EI9IVM

Ministerio de Vivienda y Ordenamiento Territorial (UY). Plan Nacional de Aguas [Internet]. Montevideo: MVOTMA; 2017 [cited 2023 Nov 07]. 325p. Available from: https://bit.ly/49rxkIk

Morábito J, Mirábile C, Salatino S. Eficiencia de riego superficial, actual y potencial en el área de regadío del río Mendoza (Argentina). Ingeniería del Agua. 2007;14(3):199-213.

Morábito J, Salatino S, Angella G, Prieto D. Evaluación de campo al riego de los agricultores: casos prácticos y ventajas para la difusión de la tecnología apropiada; asesoramiento a los regantes para la modernización de los regadíos y su ambientalidad. Paper presented at Jornadas sobre Ambiente y Riegos: Modernización y Ambientalidad; 2008; La Antigua, Guatemala.

Morábito J. Desempeño del riego por superficie en el área de riego del rio Mendoza: eficiencia actual y potencial: parámetros de riego y recomendaciones para un mejor aprovechamiento agrícola en un marco sustentable [master’s thesis]. Mendoza (AR): Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; 2003. 97p.

Pascual B. El riego: principios y prácticas. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica; 1990. 395p.

Pereira LS, de Juan JA, Picornell MR, Tarjuelo JM. El riego y sus tecnologías. Albacete: CREA-UCLM; 2010. 296p.

Puppo L, Aguerre M, Camio G, Hayashi R, Morales P. Evaluación del riego por melgas en los suelos del sur del Uruguay: uso del modelo WinSRFR, resultados preliminares. Agrociencia. 2018;22(2):79-92. Doi: 10.31285/AGRO.22.2.9.

Raine SR, Bakker D. Increased furrow irrigation efficiency through better design and management of cane fields. In: Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Brisbane: Watson Ferguson and Co.; 1996. pp. 119-24.

Richards L, Weaber L. Moisture retention by some irrigated soil as related to soils moisture tension. J Agric Res.1944;69:215-35.

SAS Institute. SAS/STAT® 9.1: user’s guide. Cary: SAS Institute; 2004. 5121p.

Walker WR, Skogerboe GV. Surface irrigation: theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1987. 386p.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-06

How to Cite

1.
Ribas G, García C. Performance assessment of furrow irrigation in two different soil textures under high rainfall and field slope conditions. Agrocienc Urug [Internet]. 2024 Feb. 6 [cited 2024 Mar. 5];27(NE1):e1187. Available from: https://agrocienciauruguay.uy/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/1187

Issue

Section

Irrigation and water management
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views