Grassland afforestation

towards an integrative perspective of its ecological oportunities and costs

Authors

  • E. G. Jobbágy Grupo de Estudios Ambientales – IMASL, Universidad Nacional de San Luis & CONICET Ejército de los Andes 950 - Primer Piso (5700) San Luis - ARGENTINA.
  • M. Vasallo Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección – IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Av San Martín 4453 (1417) Ciudad de Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA.
  • K. A. Farley Center on Global Change, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, Estados Unidos de América.
  • G. Piñeiro Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección – IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Av San Martín 4453 (1417) Ciudad de Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA.
  • M. F. Garbulsky Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección – IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Av San Martín 4453 (1417) Ciudad de Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA.
  • M. D. Nosetto Grupo de Estudios Ambientales – IMASL, Universidad Nacional de San Luis & CONICET Ejército de los Andes 950 - Primer Piso (5700) San Luis - ARGENTINA.
  • R. B. Jackson Department of Biology and Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, Estados Unidos de América.
  • J. M. Paruelo Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección – IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Av San Martín 4453 (1417) Ciudad de Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.10.934

Keywords:

carbon sequestration, hydrological cycle, land use change, soil acidification, tree plantation

Abstract

The establishment of tree plantations on native grasslands is expanding in Argentina and Uruguay, prometed by public incentives and, likely, by an emerging market of carbon sequestration. We assessed how this transformation affects the production of ecosystem goods and services, synthesizing preexisting and original information on their influence on biomass production, water dynamics, and nutrient cycling. Field and satellite measurements show that, compared to grasslands, tree plantations in Uruguay, Entre Ríos, and Corrientes had higher primary productivity. This productivity increase was accompanied by higher evapotranspiration rates and a lower water yield, responsible of halving stream flow in afforested watersheds in Córdoba and Uruguay, in agreement with observations on 26 afforested grasslands around the world. In Buenos Aires, where phreatic water is close to the surface, trees used groundwater increasing the salinity of deep soil and the water table. Most of the tree plantations in the region acidified soils and in some cases stream water, mainly as a result of their high calcium consumption. It is urgent to generate information about other impacts of tree plantations such as changes in fire dynamics or invasive species. An integrative understanding of the influence of tree plantations on the production of goods and services will help to development new forestry systems and policies that are more sustainable and useful for society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2006-12-01

How to Cite

1.
Jobbágy EG, Vasallo M, Farley KA, Piñeiro G, Garbulsky MF, Nosetto MD, et al. Grassland afforestation: towards an integrative perspective of its ecological oportunities and costs. Agrocienc Urug [Internet]. 2006 Dec. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 23];10(2):109-24. Available from: https://agrocienciauruguay.uy/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/934

Issue

Section

Seminario Internacional IAI_SGP004
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Most read articles by the same author(s)