Greenhouse gasses potential offset by forest species and CO2 balance in integrated forestry-livestock systems in Uruguay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.29.1501Keywords:
forestry, carbon stock, climate change, livestock, mitigationAbstract
Uruguay's livestock methane is a mayor source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, despite the country’s low overall emissions. A case study was conducted on Forestal Caja Bancaria (FCB), a commercial farm in Uruguay's central region, with an integrated production system covering 5,802 hectares. The study aimed to estimate GHG emissions from livestock, crops and forestry, CO2 captured by eucalypt and pine plantations, and soil organic carbon for all land uses. Results showed that cattle enteric fermentation accounted for 54 kg.ha-1.yr-1 of methane (CH4), and total emissions accounted for 1,746 kg.ha-1.yr-1 of CO2 equivalent. E. grandis, E. dunnii, and Pinus spp. captured 31, 38, and 17 Mg.ha-1.yr-1 CO2 equivalent during their pre-harvest growth cycles. According to GWP100 AR6, this capture rates could offset emissions from 17.6, 21.6 and 9.9 hectares of livestock production, respectively. Using a real system approach considering staggered plantating, harvesting, and subsequent resprouting or replanting, the estimated potential offsets are adjusted to 9.6, 11.8, and 5.1 hectares, respectively, until the first harvest. After this point, there is not further net biomass accumulation, and mitigation relies on the depletion of the remaining carbon stock in the forest area, which exceeds the carbon needed to offset livestock emissions from the previous phase. GTP100 AR6 and GWP* metrics indicated significantly lower CO2-eq emission values. This study aims to provide technical coefficients to quantify how forest plantations can offset livestock emissions, contributing to the goal of "carbon-neutral" meat. This information will help to asses forest systems' mitigation potential and explore livestock-forestry combinations.
Downloads
References
Agricultural Research Council. The nutrient requirements of ruminants livestock. 7th rev. ed. London: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1980. 351p.
Allen MR, Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Millar RJ, Cain M, Frame DJ, Macey AH. A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation. N P J Clim Atmos Sci. 2018;1(1):16. Doi: 10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8
América Economía. Uruguay’s meat export revenues fell 3.6% year-on-year in 2024 [Internet]. 2025 Jan 20 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.americaeconomia.com/en/economy-markets/uruguays-meat-export-revenues-fell-36-year-year-2024
Annual Report Foreign Trade 2023: cellulose: stands out as an export product [Internet]. Montevideo: Uruguay XXI; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 16p. Available from: https://www.uruguayxxi.gub.uy/en/information-center/article/foreign-trade-annual-report-2023/?download=en
Boadi DA, Wittenberg KM. Methane production from dairy and beef heifers fed forages differing in nutrient density using the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique. Can J Anim Sci. 2002;82(2):201-6. Doi: 10.4141/A01-017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/A01-017
Bustamante-Silveira M, Siri-Prieto G, Mazzilli SR, Carrasco-Letelier L. Carbon footprint of four bioethanol cropping systems in a temperate region. Biofuels. 2024;15:1029-39. Doi: 10.1080/17597269.2024.2327154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2024.2327154
Cain M, Jenkins S, Allen MR, Lynch J, Frame DJ, Macey AH, Peters GP. Methane and the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022;380(2215):20200456. Doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0456
Castaño JP, Giménez A, Ceroni M, Furest J, Aunchayna F. Caracterización agroclimática del Uruguay 1980-2009. Montevideo INIA; 2011. 34p.
Cellulose displaces beef as Uruguay’s main export product. Uruguay XXI [Internet]. 2024 Oct 09 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.uruguayxxi.gub.uy/en/news/article/la-celulosa-desplazo-a-la-carne-bovina-como-principal-producto-de-exportacion-de-uruguay/
de Souza KW, Pulrolnik K, Guimarães Júnior R, Marchão RL, Vilela L, de Carvalho AM, Maciel GA, de Moraes Neto SP, de Oliveira AD. Offsetting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through crop-livestock-forest integration. Planaltina: Embrapa; 2020. 13p.
Del Prado A, Lynch J, Liu S, Ridoutt B, Pardo G, Mitloehner F. Animal board invited review: opportunities and challenges in using GWP* to report the impact of ruminant livestock on global temperature change. Animal. 2023;17(5):100790. Doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100790
Dempsey C. Uruguay Pioneers Carbon Neutral Meat in South America. BizLatin Hub [Internet]. 2024 Sep 23 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.bizlatinhub.com/carbon-neutral-meat-uruguay/
Dieguez Cameroni FJ, Varela Casadey F, Boscana M, Schinatto F, Bussoni A. Advancing carbon neutrality in Silvopastoral systems: a case study applying agent-based modeling. Agroforestry Systems. 2024;98:2209-24. Doi: 10.1007/s10457-024-00983-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00983-y
Dini Y, Gere JI, Cajarville C, Ciganda VS. Using highly nutritious pastures to mitigate enteric methane emissions from cattle grazing systems in South America. Anim Prod Sci. 2018;58:2329-34. Doi: 10.1071/AN16803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16803
Dittmann MT, Runge U, Lang RA, Moser D, Galeffi C, Kreuzer M, Clauss M. Methane emission by camelids. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94363. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094363
Doldan J, Fariña I, Tarigo F. Utilización de Eucalyptus spp.: alternativas de plantaciones Uruguayas para pulpa Kraft. Innotec. 2011;(3):30-4. Doi: 10.26461/03.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26461/03.04
Doran-Browne N, Wootton M, Taylor C, Eckard R. Offsets required to reduce the carbon balance of sheep and beef farms through carbon sequestration in trees and soils. Anim Prod Sci. 2018;58(9):1648-55. Doi: 10.1071/AN16438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16438
Forestry sector in Uruguay [Internet]. Montevideo: Uruguay XXI; 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 48p. Available from: https://www.uruguayxxi.gub.uy/uploads/informacion/7fb3e87b60c7c4c1dbbb248c118fe7d1531d6767.pdf
Frame D, Melia N. Offsetting livestock methane with trees: balancing warming from ruminant methane emissions with cooling from carbon sequestration by forestry [Internet]. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment; 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 17p. Available from: https://pce.parliament.nz/media/gf3pn2ua/frame-and-melia-offsetting-livestock-methane-with-trees.pdf
Freer M, Dove H, Nolan JV. Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants. Collingwood: CSIRO; 2007. 270p.
Gardi C, Angelini M, Barceló S, Comerma J, Cruz Gaistardo C, Encina Rojas A, Jones A, Krasilnikov P, Mendonça Santos Brefin ML, Montanarella L, Muñiz Ugarte O, Schad P, Vara Rodríguez MI, Vargas R. Atlas de suelos de América Latina y el Caribe [Internet]. Luxembourg: Comisión Europea; 2014 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 176p. Available from: https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/soil-atlas-latin-america
Gavrilova O, Leip A, Dong H, MacDonald J, Gomez Bravo C, Amon B, Barahona Rosales R, del Prado A, de Lima M, Oyhantçabal W, van der Weerden T, Widiawati Y. Emissions from livestock and manure management. In: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [Internet]. Vol.4, Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Geneve: IPCC; 2019 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 207p. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/pdf/4_Volume4/19R_V4_Ch10_Livestock.pdf
Gere JI, Bualó RA, Perini AL, Arias RD, Ortega FM, Wulff AE, Berra G. Methane emission factors for beef cows in Argentina: effect of diet quality. N Z J Agr Res. 2019;64(2):260-8. Doi: 10.1080/00288233.2019.1621355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2019.1621355
Gonzalez Chaves MD, Resquín F, Balmelli G. Performance of Eucalyptus tereticornis provenances in subtropical climate. Agrocienc Urug. 2021;25(1):e322. Doi: 10.31285/agro.25.322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.322
Gorga L, Mila F. Cadena de la carne vacuna: situación y perspectivas. In: Anuario 2023 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 27p. Available from: https://descargas.mgap.gub.uy/OPYPA/Anuarios/Anuarioopypa2023/CP/2/CP2web/CP2Cadenadelacarnevacuna.pdf
Grace PR, Basso B. Offsetting greenhouse gas emissions through biological carbon sequestration in North Eastern Australia. Agric Syst. 2012;105(1):1-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.08.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.08.006
Hicks R. Legal complaint filed against Korean industry giants for greenwashing by double-counting emissions cuts. Eco Business [Internet] 2024 Mar 11 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.eco-business.com/news/legal-complaint-filed-against-korean-industry-giants-for-greenwashing-by-double-counting-emissions-cuts/
Hirigoyen A, Resquin F, Navarro Cerrillo R, Franco J, Rachid Casnati C. Stand biomass estimation methods for Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus dunnii in Uruguay. Bosque (Valdivia). 2021;42(1):53-66. Doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002021000100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002021000100053
Hollinger DY, Maclaren JP, Beets PN, Turland J. Carbon sequestration by New Zealand’s plantation forests. N Z J For Sci. 1993;23:194-208.
International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management systems: Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign: ISO 14006:2000. 2nd ed. Geneva: ISO; 2020. 32p.
IPCC. Climate Change 2014: synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC; 2014. 151p.
IPCC. Climate Change 2021: the physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021. 2391p. Doi: 10.1017/9781009157896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Journeaux PR. Pros and cons of using forestry as a compensation mechanism for greenhouse gases emissions on New Zealand pastoral farms. In: XII Congreso Internacional Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Montevideo: [publisher unknown]; 2023. p. 1073-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37572/EdArt_3010242772
Kikstra JS, Nicholls ZRJ, Smith CJ, Lewis J, Lamboll RD, Byers E, Sandstad M, Meinshausen M, Gidden MJ, Rogelj J, Kriegler E, Peters GP, Fuglestvedt JS, Skeie RB, Samset BH, Wienpahl L, van Vuuren DP, van der Wijst K-I, Al Khourdajie A, Forster PM, Reisinger A, Schaeffer R, Riahi K. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures. Geosci Model Dev. 15:9075-109. Doi: 10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
Köppen W. Das geographische System der Klimate. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger; 1936. 44p.
Kreibich N, Hermwille L. Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. Clim Policy. 2021;21(7):939-57. Doi: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384
Latin America News. Uruguay to export first certified carbon-neutral meat shipment in South America. The Rio Times [Internet]. 2021 Dic 06 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/rio-politics/uruguay-to-export-first-carbon-neutral-certified-meat-shipment-in-south-america/
Latin American Carbon Neutral Beef. Minerva Foods [Internet]. 2021 Dic 06 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://minervafoods.com/en/co2-neutral/
López-Vallejo M. Non-additionality, overestimation of supply, and double counting in offset programs: insight for the Mexican carbon market. In: Lucatello S, editor. Towards an emissions trading system in Mexico: rationale, design and connections with the Global Climate Agenda: outlook on the first ETS in Latin-America and Exploration of the Way Forward. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 191-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82759-5_10
Loza-Balbuena I. Impacts of carbon trading on afforestation projects in Uruguay [master's thesis]. Chistchurch: Universidad de Canterbury; 2001. 113p.
Mayberry D, Bartlett H, Moss J, Davison T, Herrero M. Pathways to carbon-neutrality for the Australian red meat sector. Agric Syst. 2019;175:13-21. Doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.05.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.05.009
Mello SL de M, Gonçalves JL de M. Equações para estimar a biomassa da parte aérea e do sistema radicular em povoamentos de Eucalyptus grandis em sítios com produtividades distintas. Rev Árvore. 2008;32:101-11. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-67622008000100012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622008000100012
Methol R. SAG eucalyptus: sistema de apoyo a la gestión de plantaciones de plantaciones de Eucalyptus orientadas a la producción de celulosa en Uruguay. Montevideo: INIA; 2008. 26p.
Methol R. SAG grandis: sistema de apoyo a la gestión de Eucalyptus grandis. Montevideo: INIA; 2003. 42p.
Ministerio de Ambiente (UY); Sistema Nacional de Respuesta al Cambio Climático (UY). Informe del Inventario Nacional de Gases de Efecto Invernadero Uruguay: serie 1990-2022 [Internet]. Montevideo: MA; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 517p. Available from: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ambiente/sites/ministerio-ambiente/files/2025-01/NID_1990-2022.pdf
Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca, SNIG (UY). Datos Preliminares basados en la Declaración Jurada de Existencias DICOSE – SNIG 2020 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.snig.gub.uy/principal/snig-principal-institucional-indicadores
Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, DGF (UY). Presentación de la Cartografía Forestal Nacional 2024 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/noticias/presentacion-cartografia-forestal-nacional-2024
Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, DGRN (UY). Grupos de suelos CO.N.E.A.T. [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. 62p. Available from: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/politicas-y-gestion/coneat
Monteiro A, Barreto-Mendes L, Fanchone A, Morgavi DP, Pedreira BC, Magalhães CAS, Abdalla AL, Eugène M. Crop-livestock-forestry systems as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing the sustainability of forage-based livestock systems in the Amazon biome. Sci Total Environ. 2024;906:167396. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167396
National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th rev. ed. Washington: National Academies Press; 2000. 248p.
Palma-Cancino DJ, Mercado-Zapata FJ, Palma-López DJ, Jasso-Mata J, Carillo-Ávila E, Salgado-García S. Producción de biomasa y extracción de nutrimentos en una plantación de Eucalyptus grandis (Hill ex Maiden) y Eucalyptus urophylla (S.T. Blake) en ultisoles de México. Agro Productividad. 2019;12(7):6p. Doi: 10.32854/agrop.v0i0.1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v0i0.1436
Paruelo J, Ciganda V, Gasparri I, Panizza A. Oportunidades y desafíos del uso de los bosques nativos integrados a la producción ganadera de Uruguay. Montevideo: INIA; 2022. 103p.
Rachid-Casnati C, Hirigoyen A. “SAG Taeda”: sistema de apoyo a la gestión de plantaciones de pinus taeda. Montevideo: INIA; 2015. 22p.
Rachid-Casnati C, Mason E, Woollons R. Using soil-based and physiographic variables to improve stand growth equations in Uruguayan forest plantations. IForest. 2019;12(3):237-45. Doi: 10.3832/ifor2926-012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2926-012
Rachid-Casnati C, Resquin F, Carrasco-Letelier L. Availability and environmental performance of wood for a second-generation biorefinery. Forests. 2021;12(11):1609. Doi: 10.3390/f12111609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111609
Raji K. Is carbon offset a form of greenwashing? Earth.org [Internet] 2023 Aug 5 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://earth.org/is-carbon-offset-a-form-of-greenwashing/
RED+ Uruguay. Paquete de preparación RED+ Uruguay para el fondo cooperativo para el carbono de los bosques. Montevideo: MGAP; 2022. 105p.
Resende LO, Müller MD, Kohmann MM, Pinto LFG, Cullen Junior L, de Zen S, Rego LFG. Silvopastoral management of beef cattle production for neutralizing the environmental impact of enteric methane emission. Agrofor Syst. 2020;94(3):893-903. Doi: 10.1007/s10457-019-00460-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00460-x
Resquin F, Baez K, de Freitas S, Passarella D, Coelho-Duarte AP, Rachid-Casnati C. Impact of thinning on the yield and quality of Eucalyptus Grandis wood at harvest time in Uruguay. Forests. 2024;15(5):810. Doi: 10.3390/f15050810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f15050810
Resquin F, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Carrasco-Letelier L, Casnati CR, Bentancor L. Evaluation of the nutrient content in biomass of Eucalyptus species from short rotation plantations in Uruguay. Biomass Bioenerg. 2020;134:105502. Doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105502
Resquin F, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Carrasco-Letelier L, Casnati CR. Influence of contrasting stocking densities on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and wood density of Eucalyptus benthamii, Eucalyptus dunnii, and Eucalyptus grandis for bioenergy in Uruguay. For Ecol Manage. 2019;438:63-74. Doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.007
Rodrigues-Honda KCDS, Junkes CFO, Lima JC, Waldow VA, Rocha FS, Sausen TL, Bayer C, Talamini E, Fett-Neto AG. Carbon Sequestration in Resin-Tapped Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) Subtropical Plantations. Biology (Basel). 2023;12(2):324. Doi: 10.3390/biology12020324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020324
Rodríguez López S. Así es la carne carbono neutral uruguaya. Revista Forestal. 2022;(33):26-32.
Saint-André L, M’Bou AT, Mabiala A, Mouvondy W, Jourdan C, Roupsard O, Deleporte P, Hamel O, Nouvellon Y. Age-related equations for above- and below-ground biomass of a Eucalyptus hybrid in Congo. For Ecol Manage. 2005;205:199-214. Doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.006
Silveira L, Alonso J, Martínez L. Efecto de las plantaciones forestales sobre el recurso agua en el Uruguay. Agrociencia (Uruguay). 2006;10(2):75-93. Doi: 10.31285/AGRO.10.931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.10.931
Soares de Lima JM. Modelo bioeconómico para la evaluación del impacto de la genética y otras variables sobre la cadena cárnica vacuna en Uruguay [doctoral dissertation]. Valencia (ES): Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; 2009. 240p.
Suzuki T, Sommart K, Angthong W, Nguyen TV, Chaokaur A, Nitipot P, Phromloungsri A, Cai Y, Sakai T, Nishida T, Terada F, Kawashima T. Prediction of enteric methane emission from beef cattle in Southeast Asia. Anim Sci J. 2018;89(9):1287-95. Doi: 10.1111/asj.13058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13058
Tarigo F. Propiedades físicas y mecánicas de Eucalyptus tereticornis. In: Eucaliptos colorados: mejoramiento genético, propiedades y uso de la madera. Montevideo: INIA; 2008. p. 1-8.
Uruguay’s forestry sector exports US$ 2.5 billion each year. AgriBrasilis [Internet]. 2022 Aug 24 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://agribrasilis.com/2022/08/24/uruguays-forestry-sector/
Uruguayan Meatpacker Bets on Appetite for Carbon-Neutral Beef. Bloomberg [Internet]. 2021 Dic 06 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-13/uruguayan-meatpacker-bets-on-consumer-appetite-for-green-beef
Uruguay's first carbon-neutral beef exported to Switzerland. Tridge [Internet]. 2022 Jan 25 [cited 2025 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.tridge.com/news/uruguays-first-carbon-neutral-beef-exported-to-swi
Viera M, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R. A complete assessment of carbon stocks in above and below-ground biomass components of a hybrid eucalyptus plantation in Southern Brazil. Forests. 2019;10:536. Doi: 10.3390/f10070536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f10070536
Woo J, Fatima R, Kibert CJ, Newman RE, Tian Y, Srinivasan RS. Applying blockchain technology for building energy performance measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and the carbon credit market: a review of the literature. Build Environ. 2021;205:108199. Doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108199

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agrociencia Uruguay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article metrics | |
---|---|
Abstract views | |
Galley vies | |
PDF Views | |
HTML views | |
Other views |