Tools to modify cherries harvest time in Alto Valle de Río Negro and Neuquén, Argentina




hydrogen cyanamide, gibberellins, bio stimulants, New Star, Sweetheart, Regina


Cherry production is characterized by a very short fruit development period that covers an average of 80 days from flowering to harvest. Although there are varieties with different cycles, the harvest in Alto Valle de Río Negro and Neuquén, Argentina, is highly concentrated. The possibility of extending the harvest period allows to improve logistics, decongest packing work and regulate to a certain extent the supply of cherries on the market. Fruit cherries are highly perishable non-climacteric fruits and have low supply in counter season, which determines an unsaturated foreign market and the possibility to obtain good prices. The highest prices on the market depend on the fruit size and fruit quality and the harvest time (early and late). The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility of using different growth regulators and bio-stimulants to extend the sweet cherries harvest period. The use of hydrogen cyanamide (HC) in early varieties to advance the harvest and the use of Retard Cherry® (RCH) in late varieties to delay flowering and harvesting were evaluated. In addition, the effect of gibberellins (Gb) on the delay of maturity and improvement in quality in different varieties was evaluated. The use of HC allowed to advance bloom by 10 days and the harvest by 7 days in fruits of New Star, while RCH delayed the bloom (10 days) and maturity (5 days) of Santina, Lapins and Regina cherries. The application of Gb at 20 ppm from straw yellow stage until the start of the pink improves the quality of the fruits, but the effect on delaying maturity decreases with later applications. The use of regulators in cherries allows to extend the harvest window in nearly 10 days, depending on each cultivar and the meteorological conditions of the season.


Download data is not yet available.


Baggiolini M. Les stades repères du pecher. Revue Romande d’Agriculture et d’Arboriculture. 1952;8(4):29.

Choi C, Toivonen P, Wiersma PA, Kappel F. Effect of gibberellic acid during development of sweet cherry fruit: physiological and molecular changes. Acta Hortic. 2004;(636):489-95.

Clayton M, Biasi W, Tayfur Agar I, Suthwick SM, Mitcham E. Postharvest quality of ‘Bing’ cherries following preharvest treatment with Hydrogen Cyanamide, Calcium Ammonium Nitrate or Gibberellic Acid. HortScience. 2003;38(3):407-11.

Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P. Consumer acceptance ob 'Brooks' and 'Bing' cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2003;28:159-67.

Facteau TJ, Chestnut NE, Rowe KE, Payne C. Brine quality of gibberellic acid treated 'Napoleon' sweet cherries. HortScience. 1992;27(2):118-22.

Godini A, Palasciano M, Ferrara G, Camposeo S, Pacifico A. On the advancement of bud break and fruit ripening induced by hydrogen cyanamide (Dormex®) in sweet cherry: a three-year study. Acta Hortic. 2008;(795):469-78.

Kappel F, MacDonald RA. Gibberellic acid increases fruit firmness, fruit size, and delays maturity of ‘Sweetheart’ sweet cherry. J Amer Pomol Soc. 2002;56(4):219-22.

Lenahan OM, Whiting MD, Elfving DC. Gibberellic acid inhibits floral bud induction and improves 'Bing' sweet cherry fruit quality. HortScience. 2006;41(3):654-59.

Özkaya O, Dündar O, Küden A. Effect of preharvest gibberellic acid treatments on postharvest quality of sweet cherry. J Food Agric Environ. 2006;4(1):189-91.

Palasciano M, Losciale P, Godini A. Dormancy breaking and advancement of maturity induced by hydrogen cyanamid (Dormex®) in cherry following normal and mild winters. Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura Vegetali. 2005;67(3):56-60.

Pérez FJ, Vergara R, Rubio S. H2O2 is involved in the dormancy-breaking effect of hydrogen cyanamide in grapevine buds. Plant Growth Regul. 2008;55:149-55.

Quiroz I. Mercado de la Cereza 2017/2018: un desafío superado con mérito. Redagrícola. 2018;(set):20-3.

Raffo Benegas MD, Mañueco L, Candan AP, Santagni B, Menni F. Dormancy breaking and advancement of maturity induced by Hydrogen Cyanamide: a strategy to improve profits in sweet cherries production. Acta Hortic. 2014;(1020):497-503.

Raffo D, Candan AP, Calvo P. Variedades de cereza en el Alto Valle. Río Negro: INTA; 2009.15p.

Tapia C. Factores más influyentes del potencial productivo y calidad de la fruta de cerezo. Redagrícola. 2018;(ago):46-50.

Tapia C. Utilización de Retard Cherry® para retardar floración y cosecha en cinco variedades, en la zona de Molina VII Región: resultados temporada 2016-2017. Talca: Nehuen Agrofrutícola; 2017. 4p.

Zhang C, Whiting MD. Improving ‘Bing’ sweet cherry fruit quality with plant grouth regulators. Sci Hort. 2011;127:341-6.



How to Cite

Raffo D, Curetti M. Tools to modify cherries harvest time in Alto Valle de Río Negro and Neuquén, Argentina. Agrocienc Urug [Internet]. 2021 Apr. 6 [cited 2023 Jan. 27];25(NE1):e401. Available from:



Physiology, propagation and new technologies