Dipotassium Phosphate Enhances Ethanol Tolerance, Production, and Cell Viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Batch Fermentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.30.1877Keywords:
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ethanol, cell viability, potassium phosphate, fermentationAbstract
This study evaluated ethanol production and cell viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures under different concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K₂HPO₄). Batch fermentations were carried out in shake flasks using an orbital thermostatic incubator at 30 °C, with an initial pH of 5.80. The K₂HPO₄ concentration in the culture medium was adjusted to 1.50, 2.70, and 3.20 g L⁻¹. Cultures supplemented with 3.20 g L⁻¹ K₂HPO₄ achieved the highest biomass concentration (12.10 ± 0.30 g L⁻¹). Moreover, ethanol production reached 16% (v/v) under this condition, whereas only 9% (v/v) was obtained at 1.50 g L⁻¹. Regarding volumetric ethanol productivity, a 1.6-fold increase was estimated when the K₂HPO₄ concentration was increased from 1.50 to 3.20 g L⁻¹. Additionally, under the 3.20 g L⁻¹ condition, cell viability remained above 90%, reaching a maximum of 97%, even when ethanol concentration in the broth reached 16% (v/v). In contrast, cell viability decreased by 10% and 7% at 1.50 and 2.70 g L⁻¹, respectively, when ethanol concentrations exceeded 7% (v/v). Overall, the results demonstrated that kinetic parameters such as cell viability, volumetric productivity, and ethanol concentration were positively affected by increasing K₂HPO₄ concentration, supporting its use as a nutritional strategy in the culture medium to enhance ethanol biosynthesis. These findings are particularly relevant as they highlight the potential of K₂HPO₄ as a strategic and economical nutrient to optimize ethanolic fermentations on an industrial scale, contributing to the design of bioprocesses with improvements in metabolic efficiency and prolonged productive capacity throughout the fermentation cycles.
Downloads
References
Alfenore, S., Cameleyre, X., Benbadis, L., Bideaux, C., Uribelarrea, J. L., Goma, G., Molina-Jouve, C., & Guillouet, S. E. (2004). Aeration strategy: A need for very high ethanol performance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae fed-batch process. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 63(5), 537-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1393-5
Alfenore, S., Molina-Jouve, C., Guillouet, S. E., Uribelarrea, J. L., Goma, G., & Benbadis, L. (2002). Improving ethanol production and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a vitamin feeding strategy during fed-batch process. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 60(1-2), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1092-7
Alminderej, F. M., Hamden, Z., El-Ghoul, Y., Hammami, B., Saleh, S. M., & Majdoub, H. (2022). Impact of calcium and nitrogen addition on bioethanol production by S. cerevisiae fermentation from date by-products: Physicochemical characterization and technical design. Fermentation, 8(11), Article 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110583
Álvarez, R., Garces, F., Louis, E. J., Dequin, S., & Camarasa, C. (2023). Beyond S. cerevisiae for winemaking: Fermentation-related trait diversity in the genus Saccharomyces. Food Microbiology, 113, Article 104270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2023.104270
Azbekyan, G. S., Shirvanyan, A. H., & Trchounian, K. A. (2025). Inhibitory effect of acetic acid on the fermentative metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9804 at pH 3.0. Journal of Innovative Solutions for Eco-Environmental Sustainability, (SI 1), Article 188. https://doi.org/10.46991/JISEES.2025.SI1.188
Barreto, L., Canadell, D., Valverde-Saubí, D., Casamayor, A., & Ariño, J. (2012). The short-term response of yeast to potassium starvation. Environmental Microbiology, 14(11), 3026-3042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02887.x
Bennett, C. (1971). Spectrophotometric acid dichromate method for the determination of ethyl alcohol. The American Journal of Medical Technology, 37(6), 217-220.
Biswas, B., & Biswas, A. B. (2022). Effects of some chemical nutrients on bioethanol production from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hydrolyzed by heat- and ethanol-resistant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae AB810. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 99(10), Article 100725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2022.100725
Breisha, G. Z. (2010). Production of 16% ethanol from 35% sucrose. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(8), 1243-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.03.017
Burphan, T., Tatip, S., Limcharoensuk, T., Kangboonruang, K., Boonchird, C., & Auesukaree, C. (2018). Enhancement of ethanol production in very high gravity fermentation by reducing fermentation-induced oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 13069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31558-4
Canadell, D., González, A., Casado, C., & Ariño, J. (2015). Functional interactions between potassium and phosphate homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Microbiology, 95(3), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12886
Casey, G. P., & Ingledew, W. M. (1985). Reevaluation of alcohol synthesis and tolerance in brewer’s yeast. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 43(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1094/ASBCJ-43-0075
Coleman, M. C., Fish, R., & Block, D. E. (2007). Temperature-dependent kinetic model for nitrogen-limited wine fermentations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(18), 5875-5884. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00670-07
Díaz-Barrera, A., Sanchez-Rosales, F., Padilla-Córdova, C., Andler, R., & Peña, C. (2021). Molecular weight and guluronic/mannuronic ratio of alginate produced by Azotobacter vinelandii at two bioreactor scales under diazotrophic conditions. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 44(6), 1275-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02532-8
Eliodório, K. P., Cunha, G. C. G. E., Lino, F. S. O., Sommer, M. O. A., Gombert, A. K., Giudici, R., & Basso, T. O. (2023). Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during growth on industrial sugar cane molasses can be reproduced in a tailor-made defined synthetic medium. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 10567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37618-8
He, X., Guo, X., Liu, N., & Zhang, B. (2007). Ergosterol production from molasses by genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 75(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0807-6
Henderson, C. M., & Block, D. E. (2014). Examining the role of membrane lipid composition in determining the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 80(10), 2966-2972. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04151-13
Jacobus, A. P., Gross, J., Evans, J. H., Ceccato-Antonini, S. R., & Gombert, A. K. (2021). Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used industrially for bioethanol production. Essays in Biochemistry, 65(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20200160
Kucharczyk, K., Żyła, K., & Tuszyński, T. (2025). Optimization of fermentation parameters in a brewery: Modulation of yeast growth and yeast cell viability. Processes, 13(3), Article 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030906
Kwolek-Mirek, M., & Zadrag-Tecza, R. (2014). Comparison of methods used for assessing the viability and vitality of yeast cells. FEMS Yeast Research, 14(7), 1068-1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12202
Lairón-Peris, M., Routledge, S. J., Linney, J. A., Alonso-Del-Real, J., Spickett, C. M., Pitt, A. R., Guillamón, J. M., Barrio, E., Goddard, A. D., & Querol, A. (2021). Lipid composition analysis reveals mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87(12), Article e0044021. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00440-21
Laluce, C., Tognolli, J. O., de Oliveira, K. F., Souza, C. S., & Morais, M. R. (2009). Optimization of temperature, sugar concentration, and inoculum size to maximize ethanol production without significant decrease in yeast cell viability. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 83(4), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1885-z
Lam, F. H., Ghaderi, A., Fink, G. R., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2014). Engineering alcohol tolerance in yeast. Science, 346(6205), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257859
Laopaiboon, L., Thanonkeo, P., Jaisil, P., & Laopaiboon, P. (2007). Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in batch and fed-batch fermentations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 23(10), 1497-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9383-x
Lin, Y., Zhang, W., Li, C., Sakakibara, K., Tanaka, S., & Kong, H. (2012). Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742. Biomass and Bioenergy, 47, 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.019
Liu, X., Jia, B., Sun, X., Ai, J., Wang, L., Wang, C., Zhao, F., Zhan, J., & Huang, W. (2015). Effect of initial pH on growth characteristics and fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Food Science, 80(4), M800-M808. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12813
Mohd Azhar, S. H., Abdulla, R., Jambo, S. A., Marbawi, H., Gansau, J. A., Mohd Faik, A. A., & Rodrigues, K. F. (2017). Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 10, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003
Molinet, J., & Cubillos, F. A. (2020). Wild yeast for the future: Exploring the use of wild strains for wine and beer fermentation. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, Article 589350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.589350
Napitupulu, A. M. M., Suhendra, L., & Gunam, I. B. W. (2021). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9763 concentration and fermentation time on bioethanol content from corn stover crude cellulose substrate. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 913, Article 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/913/1/012026
Postigo, V., García, M., Cabellos, J. M., & Arroyo, T. (2021). Wine Saccharomyces yeasts for beer fermentation. Fermentation, 7(4), Article 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040290
Ribeiro-Filho, N., Linforth, R., Bora, N., Powell, C. D., & Fisk, I. D. (2022). The role of inorganic phosphate, potassium, and magnesium in yeast flavour formation. Food Research International, 162(Pt A), Article 112044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112044
Rojo, M. C., Talia, P. M., Lerena, M. C., Ponsone, M. L., Gonzalez, M. L., Becerra, L. M., Mercado, L. A., Martín-Arranz, V., Rodríguez-Gómez, F., Arroyo-López, F. N., & Combina, M. (2023). Evaluation of different nitrogen sources on growth and fermentation performance for enhancing ethanol production by wine yeasts. Heliyon, 9(12), Article e22608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22608
Sahana, G. R., Balasubramanian, B., Joseph, K. S., Pappuswamy, M., Liu, W.-C., Meyyazhagan, A., Kamyab, H., Chelliapan, S., & Joseph, B. V. (2024). A review on ethanol tolerance mechanisms in yeast: Current knowledge in biotechnological applications and future directions. Process Biochemistry, 138, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2023.12.024
Seo, H.-B., Kim, H.-J., Lee, O.-K., Ha, J.-H., Lee, H.-Y., & Jung, K.-H. (2009). Measurement of ethanol concentration using solvent extraction and dichromate oxidation and its application to bioethanol production process. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 36(2), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0497-4
Sun, Q., Ma, J., Basit, R. A., Fu, Z., Liu, X., & Fan, G. (2024). Screening of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high 3-methylthio-1-propanol yield and optimization of its fermentation conditions. Foods (Basel), 13(9), Article 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13091296
Sun, X., Zhou, X., Yu, R., Zhou, X., Zhang, J., Xu, T., Wang, J., Li, M., Li, X., Zhang, M., Xu, J., & Zhang, J. (2025). Assessing the physiological properties of baker's yeast based on single-cell Raman spectrum technology. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology, 10(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2024.09.004
Tan, L., Zhang, Y., Liu, P., Wu, Y., Huang, Z., Hu, Z., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2025). System metabolic engineering modification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase SAM production. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 12(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-025-00858-9
Techaparin, A., Thanonkeo, P., & Klanrit, P. (2017). High-temperature ethanol production using thermotolerant yeast newly isolated from Greater Mekong Subregion. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 48(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.01.006
Thoukis, G., Ueda, M., & Wright, D. (1965). The formation of succinic acid during alcoholic fermentation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1965.16.1.1
Vamvakas, S. S., & Kapolos, J. (2020). Factors affecting yeast ethanol tolerance and fermentation efficiency. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 36(8), Article 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02881-8
Varize, C. S., Bücker, A., Lopes, L. D., Christofoleti-Furlan, R. M., Raposo, M. S., Basso, L. C., & Stambuk, B. U. (2022). Increasing ethanol tolerance and ethanol production in an industrial fuel ethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Fermentation, 8(10), Article 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100470
Walker, G., & Stewart, G. (2016). Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the production of fermented beverages. Beverages, 2(4), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages2040030
Woo, J.-M., Yang, K.-M., Kim, S.-U., Blank, L.-M., & Park, J.-B. (2014). High temperature stimulates acetic acid accumulation and enhances growth inhibition and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae under fermenting conditions. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(13), 6085-6094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5691-x
Wu, X., Staggenborg, S., Propheter, J. L., Rooney, W. L., Yu, J., & Wang, D. (2010). Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation. Industrial Crops and Products, 31(1), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.10.006
Zhao, F., Zhang, Y., Hu, J., Shi, C., Ao, X., Wang, S., Lin, Y., Sun, Z., & Han, S. (2023). Disruption of phosphate metabolism and sterol transport-related genes conferring yeast resistance to vanillin and rapid ethanol production. Bioresource Technology, 369, Article 128489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128489
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agrociencia Uruguay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley views | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |











